Quantcast
Channel: Active questions tagged feed-forward+python+neural-network - Stack Overflow
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 25

Feed Forward Neural Network Always outputs Random but Similar Values

$
0
0

I recently coded a neural network based on this online book and Sebastian Lague's brief series on neural networks on youtube. I coded it as faithfully to the original as possible but it didn't end up working. I am trying to solve a simple XOR problem with it but it always seems to give me random but similar values. I even tried copying and pasting the author's code, without changing anything, but it still didn't work.

class NeuralNetwork:    def __init__(self, layer_sizes, rate):        weight_shapes = [(a,b) for a,b in zip(layer_sizes[1:], layer_sizes[:-1])]        self.weights = [np.random.standard_normal(s)/s[1]**0.5 for s in weight_shapes]        self.biases = [np.zeros((s,1)) for s in layer_sizes[1:]]        self.rate = rate    def predict(self, a):        for w,b in zip(self.weights, self.biases):            z = np.matmul(w,a) + b            a = self.activation(z)        return a    def backprop(self, a, o):        o = np.array(o)        self.zCollection = []        # Forward Propogation        for w,b in zip(self.weights, self.biases):            z = np.matmul(w,a) + b            self.zCollection.append(z)            a = self.activation(z)        # Output error        error =  (a - o) * self.activationPrime(self.zCollection[-1])        self.weights[-1] += np.matmul(error, self.activation(self.zCollection[-2]).T) * self.rate        self.biases[-1] += error * self.rate        # Looping through layers        for i in range(2, len(self.weights)):            error = np.multiply(self.weights[-i+1].T * error,self.activationPrime(self.zCollection[-i]))            self.weights[-i] = np.add(self.weights[-i], np.matmul(error, self.activation(self.zCollection[-i-1]).T) * self.rate)            self.biases[-i] = np.add(self.biases[-i], error * self.rate)    @staticmethod    def activation(x):        return 1/(1+np.exp(-x))    @staticmethod    def activationPrime(x):        activation = lambda x : 1/(1+np.exp(-x))        return activation(x) * (1 - activation(x))if __name__ == "__main__":    inp = [[0,0],[1,0],[0,1],[1,1]]    out = [[0],[1],[1],[0]]    # Reformating arrays    inp = np.array([np.array(i) for i in inp])    inp = np.array([i.reshape((len(i), 1)) for i in inp])    out = np.array([np.array(i) for i in out])    out = np.array([i.reshape((len(i), 1)) for i in out])    layer_sizes = (2,2,1)    nn = NeuralNetwork(layer_sizes, 0.001)    print("start")    for j in range(100):        for i,o in zip(inp, out):            nn.backprop(i, o)    print("done")    for i in inp:        print(f"{[list(j) for j in i]} >> {nn.predict(i)[0,0]}")

I did some investigating myself and found that the update values for the weights were always small and constant for every iteration. I am not sure why but it looked like the weights weren't changing. I believe this may be the cause because when I set the seed at the beginning of the script the output values were incredibly similar to about 4dp, but i'm not sure. I tested the forward propagation so that cannot be the issue. I also tried randomizing the inputs, changing the learning rates, different layer sizes, and amounts. I also tried a different problem set which a perceptron could solve. That problem was to predict whether the sum of two numbers were greater than some other number. That didn't work either. When I graphed the output error over the epochs it looked like this. As you can see by the thick line the value is oscillating and seemingly decreasing. However, when I tested it it gave completely wrong results.

Here are some outputs that I am getting with different parameters:

learning rate : 100
layer_sizes : (2,2,1)
epochs : 10000

[[0], [0]] >> 1.70366026492168e-23[[1], [0]] >> 4.876567289343432e-20[[0], [1]] >> 2.4579325136292694e-24[[1], [1]] >> 9.206132845755066e-21

learning rate : 1
layer_sizes : (2,5,5,1)
epochs : 10000

[[0], [0]] >> 0.9719657241512317[[1], [0]] >> 0.9724187979341556[[0], [1]] >> 0.9736236543859843[[1], [1]] >> 0.9739884707274225

learning rate : 1
layer_sizes : (2,2,1)
epochs : 100

[[0], [0]] >> 0.3912836914268991[[1], [0]] >> 0.49042088270977163[[0], [1]] >> 0.4499482050352108[[1], [1]] >> 0.5324205501065111

Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 25

Trending Articles



<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>